Ucrânia, EUA e Rússia retomam negociações em Abu Dhabi após nove meses

Porque é importante

The talks marked the resumption of direct Ukrainian-Russian negotiations through US mediation after a nine-month pause. The discussions linked the possibility of ending the war with security guarantees, European participation, possible prisoner exchanges and a proposed new European security architecture. The territorial dispute remained unresolved, with Russia demanding roughly 5,000 km² and Ukraine refusing concessions.

O que aconteceu

Ukraine, the United States and Russia held the first round of trilateral peace negotiations in Abu Dhabi on 10 November, followed by a second round on 11 November. The session was opened by US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and lasted about four hours. The Ukrainian delegation was led by Rustem Umerov and the Russian delegation by Vladimir Medinsky.

The parties discussed ending the war, a ceasefire, security guarantees, humanitarian measures, including the possible release of prisoners, and a future European security system. Ukraine insisted that any agreements must respect its sovereignty and territorial integrity, preserve its right to make its own decisions and protect it against renewed aggression. Ukraine also sought long-term financial support for an army of 800,000 and the reconstruction of destroyed infrastructure, while opposing the deployment of European forces.

Russia sought control over about 5,000 km² of territory in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions that its forces had not captured. Ukraine rejected the reported US territorial compromise and said it had never discussed surrendering occupied territory. The talks continued into 11 November.

Como o descrevem as fontes ucranianas

Ukrainian reporting focuses on sovereignty, territorial integrity, the rejection of concessions and the need for security guarantees that would prevent another attack. It also highlights Ukraine’s demand for long-term financing for an 800,000-person army and post-war reconstruction. The assessment among Ukrainian officials and commentators was mixed: the talks were described as constructive, but their ability to advance Ukraine’s interests was questioned.

Como o descrevem as fontes internacionais

Arabic and other international reporting places greater emphasis on US mediation, the potential prisoner exchange, the proposed European security system and cautious optimism that the differences between Kyiv and Moscow have narrowed. It also gives more attention to Abu Dhabi as the negotiating venue and to the diplomatic roles of the United States and Europe. International reports foreground Russia’s territorial demands and Moscow’s stated aim of revising Europe-wide security arrangements.

Onde as versões divergem

Ukrainian officials and Oleg Shamshur offered contrasting assessments of the same talks: the officials described them as constructive and meaningful, while Shamshur said they followed a Russian scenario and did not bring Ukraine closer to peace. US negotiators expressed cautious optimism and said differences had narrowed, while a source in the Russian delegation said it was too early to draw conclusions. Ukrainian sources said territorial concessions had never been discussed, whereas reports said US negotiators had offered a territorial compromise that Ukraine rejected.

Contexto

The talks took place in Abu Dhabi on 10–11 November 2026 after a nine-month interruption in direct negotiations. Ukraine, the United States, European countries and NATO had reaffirmed support for a post-war European security architecture. Ukraine sought financial support for at least ten years to maintain an army of 800,000 and rebuild destroyed infrastructure, while the Kremlin opposed the deployment of European forces.